Implant-supported removable partial denture - a case report
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62331/2965-758X.v3.2025.63Keywords:
Emovable prosthesis, Dental implantation, Rehabilitative treatment, Oral rehabilitation, JawAbstract
Partial tooth loss is a prevalent challenge with functional, aesthetic, and psychosocial impacts. This report demonstrates the efficacy of implant-supported removable partial dentures (RPDs) for Kennedy class I. The objective was to describe mandibular rehabilitation using an RPD with O'ring attachments and spacer rings, strategically combined to compensate for mucosal resilience. Methodology included: clinical-radiographic assessment, computer-guided surgery, implant installation (teeth 34 and 45), removal/reinstallation of implant 45 with bone graft due to peri-implant infection, and final prosthetic adaptation with spacers. Results showed effective passive retention, occlusal stability, masticatory/phonetic comfort, and bone preservation after reintervention. It is concluded that implant-supported RPDs are a viable alternative, requiring adaptive management for complications but combining functional, economic, and quality-of-life benefits.
References
da Silva AJC, Arruda FJS. Desafios na implantodontia: biomateriais e sua contribuição na reabilitação de maxilas atróficas. Biosciences and Health. 2025; 3:1-7. https://doi.org/10.62331/2965-758X.v3.2025.71
Sanches CDB, Arruda FJS. Prótese protocolo com carga imediata em pacientes edêntulos totais: análise integrativa de vantagens, desvantagens e critérios de sucesso. Biosciences and Health. 2025; 3:1-7. https://doi.org/10.62331/2965-758X.v3.2025.59
Rosalen NP, Muniz FWMG, Scalco NR, Dezingrini KDS, Colussi EL, Pires ALC, et al. What variables are associated with use of and need for dental prosthesis? a cross-sectional study. Gerodontology. 2022; 39(2):177-186. https://doi.org/10.1111/ger.12552
Muniz FWMG, Fernandez MDS, Pacheco KE, Martins MW, Trevisan TC, Zatt FP, et al. Use of dental implants among older adults of two southern Brazilian cities: a population-based cross-sectional study. Spec Care Dentist. 2023; 43(1):56-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/scd.12736
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde 2019: percepção do estado de saúde, estilos de vida, doenças crônicas e saúde bucal: Brasil e grandes regiões. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2021.
Sugio CYC, Gomes ACG, Maciel JG, Procópio ALF, Neppelenbroek KH. Considerações sobre os tipos de próteses parciais removíveis e seu impacto na qualidade de vida. Rev Odontol Araçatuba. 2019; 40(2):15-21. Disponível em: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/biblio-1006531
Melo JMFO, Barbosa EF. Implant-and tooth-supported removable partial dentures: a case report. RGO (Porto Alegre). 2020; 68:e20200012. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-8637202000012201800005
Campos DS, Muniz IAF, Perez LEC, Cosme-Trindade DC. Combinando estratégias de aprendizagem para o desenvolvimento de habilidades e competências na prótese parcial removível pré-clínica: um relato de experiência. Rev Abeno. 2022; 22(2):1-12. https://doi.org/10.30979/revabeno.v22i2.1586
Zhang H, Ramos V Jr, Bratos M, Liu PP, He W. Effect of the attachments on clinical outcomes of mandibular distal extension implant-supported removable partial dentures: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2022; 128(6):1211-1220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.04.008
Kordatzis K, Wright PS, Meijer HJ. Posterior mandibular residual ridge resorption in patients with conventional dentures and implant overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003; 18(3):447-452. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12814322/
Gonçalves TM, Campos CH, Garcia RC. Implant retention and support for distal extension partial removable dental prostheses: satisfaction outcomes. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112(2):334-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.11.004
Araujo R, Zancopé K, Moreira R, Barreto T, Neves F. Mandibular implant-assisted removable partial denture - Kennedy class I to class III modification - case series with masticatory performance and satisfaction evaluation. J Clin Exp Dent. 2023; 15(1):e71-e78. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.59777
Sato M, Suzuki Y, Kurihara D, Shimpo H, Ohkubo C. Effect of implant support on mandibular distal extension removable partial dentures: relationship between denture supporting area and stress distribution. J Prosthodont Res. 2013; 57(2):109-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2013.01.002
Nogawa T, Saito M, Murashima N, Takayama Y, Yokoyama A. Influence of rigidity of retainers on dynamic behavior of implant-supported removable partial dentures. Int J Implant Dent. 2020; 6(1):60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00260-4
Kortam SA, ELsyad MA, Awad SS, ElHelbawy NE. Metal-ceramic and polyether ether ketone-composite maxillary fixed prosthesis supported by four implants and opposed by removable distal extension partial dentures: a comparative study of clinical and prosthetic outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022; 37(1):181-189. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.9189
Winkler S, Piermatti J, Rothman A, Siamos G. An overview of the O-ring implant overdenture attachment: clinical reports. J Oral Implantol. 2002; 28(2):82-86. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2002)028<0082:AOOTOI>2.3.CO;2
de Campos MR, Botelho AL, Dos Reis AC. Reasons for the fatigue of ball attachments and their O-rings: a systematic review. Dent Med Probl. 2023; 60(1):167-176. https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/146719
Ohkubo C, Kobayashi M, Suzuki Y, Hosoi T. Effect of implant support on distal-extension removable partial dentures: in vivo assessment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008; 23(6):1095-1101. Disponível em: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19216279/
Bural C, Buzbas B, Ozatik S, Bayraktar G, Emes Y. Distal extension mandibular removable partial denture with implant support. Eur J Dent. 2016; 10(4):566-570. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.195180
Bandiaky ON, Lokossou DL, Soueidan A, Le Bars P, Gueye M, Mbodj EB, et al. Implant-supported removable partial dentures compared to conventional dentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of quality of life, patient satisfaction, and biomechanical complications. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022; 8(1):294-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.521
Liñares A, Dopico J, Magrin G, Blanco J. Critical review on bone grafting during immediate implant placement. Periodontol 2000. 2023; 93(1):309-326. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12516
Jofre J, Valenzuela D, Quintana P, Asenjo-Lobos C. Protocol for immediate implant replacement of infected teeth. Implant Dent. 2012; 21(4):287-294. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e31825cbcf8
Casap N, Zeltser C, Wexler A, Tarazi E, Zeltser R. Immediate placement of dental implants into debrided infected dentoalveolar sockets. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65(3):384-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.02.031
Noelken R, Pausch T, Wagner W, Al-Nawas B. Peri-implant defect grafting with autogenous bone or bone graft material in immediate implant placement in molar extraction sites-1- to 3-year results of a prospective randomized study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020; 31(11):1138-1148. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13660
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Maria Eduarda Cestari dos Santos, Farid Jamil Silva de Arruda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
